Live market ticker scrolling. Instruments tracked: EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, Gold, S&P 500, Bitcoin. Live prices are provided by TradingView. Use the pause ticker button to stop the motion.

FXSpreadMeterFXSpreadMeter

Head to head

Pepperstone vs XTB: which is better?

Pepperstone logoPepperstone9.0/10 · $0 minXTB logoXTB8.7/10 · $0 min
How pricing works: spreads, commission, ECN & leverage

Pepperstone and XTB are compared here on the trading conditions that decide cost: verified spreads by account type, commission, minimum deposit, leverage, regulation, platforms and market coverage. Both appear in our Best Overall and Best for Day Trading rankings, which is why traders shortlist them together. Every figure below is read straight from each broker’s own record — spreads come from the Spread Meter dataset with a source and a verification date, not from marketing pages. On our scoring model Pepperstone leads at 9.0/10 against 8.7/10, but the right answer depends on which of the differences below matters to how you trade.

Key differences between Pepperstone and XTB

  • Lowest verified spread

    Pepperstone Standard From 1.0 pips ($0); ECN From 0.0 pips (£2.25 per lot per side on MT4/MT5 (US$3.00 per side on cTrader; US$3.50 per side on the Pepperstone platform))
    XTB Standard From 0.8 pips ($0)

    Pepperstone has the lower verified entry spread of the two.

  • Minimum deposit

    Pepperstone $0
    XTB $0

    Both open from $0.

  • Regulation

    Pepperstone FCA, ASIC, DFSA, BaFin, SCB, CMA
    XTB FCA, KNF, IFSC

    Pepperstone holds more licences on record (6 vs 3).

  • Platforms

    Pepperstone MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
    XTB xStation 5, xStation Mobile

    Only Pepperstone offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView; Only XTB offers xStation 5, xStation Mobile.

  • Overall score

    Pepperstone 9.0/10
    XTB 8.7/10

    Pepperstone scores higher overall (9.0 against 8.7).

Side by side

Pricing is the lowest verified figure per account type from the Spread Meter dataset; every other field is read from the broker’s own record.

Overall rating
Pepperstone4.6
XTB4.4
Overall score
Pepperstone9.0/10
XTB8.7/10
Regulation
PepperstoneFCA, ASIC, DFSA, BaFin, SCB, CMA
XTBFCA, KNF, IFSC
Pricing by account type
Pepperstone
  • Standard·From 1.0 pipsCommission $0
  • ECN(Razor)·From 0.0 pipsCommission £2.25 per lot per side on MT4/MT5 (US$3.00 per side on cTrader; US$3.50 per side on the Pepperstone platform)
XTB
  • Standard·From 0.8 pipsCommission $0
Minimum deposit
Pepperstone$0
XTB$0
Leverage
Pepperstone1:30 for FCA and ASIC retail clients; higher under other group entities
XTB1:30 for FCA and KNF retail clients; higher under other group entities
Platforms
PepperstoneMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
XTBxStation 5, xStation Mobile
Account types
PepperstoneStandard, Razor, Swap-free (region dependent)
XTBStandard
Markets
PepperstoneForex, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, Currency indices, Crypto CFDs
XTBForex, Indices, Commodities, Stock CFDs, ETF CFDs
Payment methods
PepperstoneBank transfer, Visa / Mastercard, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller
XTBBank transfer, Visa / Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller
Best for
PepperstoneRegulated multi-platform trading
XTBTraders who prefer a single proprietary platform
Open an account
Pepperstone4.6Review

Who each broker suits

Pepperstone

Regulated multi-platform trading

XTB

Traders who prefer a single proprietary platform

Our verdict

Pepperstone takes this head-to-head on our scoring model at 9.0/10. Costs, leverage caps and available entities change often, and the entity that onboards you depends on your country. Confirm the live figures with Pepperstone and XTB directly before funding an account, and read the full reviews for the detail behind each score.

Other comparisons

FXSpreadMeter Ratings

Top Rated Forex Brokers 2026

Compare highly rated brokers across trading costs, platforms, regulation and overall conditions.

FP Markets logo

Rank #1

FP Markets

Rating

8.8 / 10

Best for
Shares and FX in one place
Why it ranks here
FP Markets pairs raw-spread FX pricing with direct-market-access share dealing, so cost-sensitive traders and multi-asset investors can work from one account group. Five platform choices, ASIC oversight and a $100 entry point make it our strongest all-round pick this quarter.
IC Markets logo

Rank #2

IC Markets

Rating

9.4 / 10

Best for
Raw-spread trading
Why it ranks here
IC Markets is built around cheap execution rather than hand-holding. If you already know how you want to trade and value platform choice, the Raw Spread tier is one of the more compelling cost structures available. Read the entity disclosure carefully: the leverage headline you see may come from the offshore arm rather than the ASIC-regulated one.
XM Group logo

Rank #3

XM Group

Rating

8.6 / 10

Best for
New traders
Why it ranks here
XM is a sensible starting point rather than a cost leader. The tiny minimum deposit, deep education library and responsive support suit traders still finding their footing; once volume grows, the Standard account's spread-only pricing starts to look expensive next to raw-spread rivals.
eToro logo

Rank #4

eToro

Rating

8.4 / 10

Best for
Copy trading
Why it ranks here
eToro trades execution cost for accessibility. The social layer and multi-asset account are genuinely useful if you want to follow others or hold equities alongside FX, but active intraday traders will feel the spread and miss MetaTrader.
XTB logo

Rank #5

XTB

Rating

8.8 / 10

Best for
Traders who prefer a single proprietary platform
Why it ranks here
XTB is a listed international broker running its own xStation platform, with a research and education layer that suits traders who prefer one integrated interface.
Capital.com logo

Rank #6

Capital.com

Rating

8.4 / 10

Best for
Newer CFD traders who want guided tools
Why it ranks here
Capital.com combines a clean proprietary platform with MT4 access and an in-app learning layer aimed at newer CFD traders.

Affiliate disclosure: FXSpreadMeter may receive compensation from some broker partners when users register through links on our website. This does not guarantee a broker's suitability or performance. Trading involves significant risk.